I can't read the security letters/numbers. The codes that are sent to me don't work. I've tried every password know. I am having a terrible time getting started with my new Office 365.7.3 177 150 92.4 92.5 3652 5.1 3.6 15.3 Radio and television. Related rec ines - Typesriters - Office mac ines , n.e.c.3.1 6.2. Office 365 customers remaining on older macOS versions with Office 2016 for Mac will receive mainstream. Technician's Assistant: What application are you usingWill your PC run Windows 11? Even Microsoft can't say for sureYour new Office 365 account will include the latest versions of the following programs, both online and offline: Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Outlook, OneNote.As part of the upcoming September 2018 update, Office 365 for Mac users on macOS 10.12 or later will receive an update from the Office 2016 for Mac client to Office 2019 for Mac in order to maintain access to new feature releases and updates. I don't need all of the security stuff.It's also not as cut and dry as Microsoft initially communicated either.Now, it's one thing for a computer industry pundit to talk about orphaned systems and discuss them impartially. He has now determined that the group of orphaned systems is much larger than either of us previously thought. ZDNet's Ed Bott has done considerable due diligence into which systems will be able to make the transition. And don't count on the compatibility checker for much help.It's not the kind of change that will break apps or orphan the majority of PCs, although there is the outside possibility some older systems, such as 32-bit machines, may be left out - and, frankly, those machines are very long in the tooth.But the reality is, for 90% of us, if we have a PC that is running Windows 10 today, at some point in the fall, Microsoft is going to offer us an upgrade through Windows Update, and it will be painless just like any other fall update.Well, it turns out I was incorrect.As it turns out, they won't make it as they are six (in the case of the Dell XPS 8900) and seventh-generation Intel systems. They both run fine, and the software on them will be supported until 2025 (January 2024 in the case of Windows Server Essentials 2019).But I fully expected these boxes to work with Windows 11 and Server 2022, either physically or virtually. They've both hit the 4-year mark and are current with patches and such. As I soon learned, my systems are not immune.What Windows 11 means: We'll be stuck with millions of Windows 10 zombies We're stuckIn 2017 I bought a Dell XPS 8900 (Core i7-6700) as my main Windows 10 testing machine and an HP Proliant ML10 with a Xeon Bronze for Windows Server and virtualization. My boxes were going to be OK.Wrong. Those "old" systems that would be stuck on Windows 10 until support ended in 2025? Nah, that wasn't me.
As someone who has been a Mac user for the past three years and has bought a lot of Apple tech, I've gotten used to the Mac and iOS/iPadOS stuff and - I dare say - enjoy the tight integration of this ecosystem.Right now, my work-issued 2019-era Macbook, purchased in early 2020, is an Intel machine. Period.I suspect that small and medium enterprises are mulling exactly these sort of considerations too.In terms of personal technology, I now have to think about what I invest in going forward. So if the apps are not going to change due to the new OS requirements and the machines are running well, I will not buy new systems. But I feel they have at least two more years of life left in them, and the workloads on them currently run fine. Historically, I would start thinking about replacing them now based on my previous behavior of doing so every five years. There has to be something tangible besides a UX that will compel me to buy a new box or a pressing need to do so, such as an EOL on the support that drives me to make replacements.My systems are four years old. I need to replace it - but considering my wife loves her iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, I think I'm going to pick her up an Apple Silicon Mac Mini or a Macbook Air in a few months. In addition, it has an older, slower WiFi chip that can only do 2.4ghz networking. Unfortunately, it's very creaky and crusty and doesn't run Windows 10 that well. Assuming I am still working for my existing company by then, it will likely be replaced by an Apple Silicon Macbook.My wife's laptop, an older Dell, has a 3rd-generation i7. By that time, Apple will have wholly transitioned from x86 technology to Apple Silicon. Based on Apple's current Monterey support, which even has some 2013-era Mac Pro systems on it, I expect the laptop to take another two or three OS version updates from Apple before my employer wants to decommission the asset. Can your PC upgrade to Windows 11? Check this app Here's how to get Microsoft's free operating system update Windows 11 upgrade: Five questions to ask first Download cc cleaner macConsidering that I have to be the one to support them, I will most likely recommend (excuse me, insist) they also move to Macs when it is time for their boxes to take the rainbow bridge. They've been reluctant to make replacements, but they've also invested in various Apple gear, such as their iPhones and iPads. There's a loophole for 'unsupported' hardwareMy parents also have Windows boxes dating probably back to around 2016. So depending on one's use case, it might make sense to hold off on buying a new Windows laptop now.There is currently no evidence that the Arm version of Windows 11 will run flawlessly on Parallels, as the software now only supports DirectX 11, and Windows 11 is DirectX 12. We will know more about Windows 11 on Arm likely sometime in October when we hear about the actual release pipeline from the Surface team. The M1 running it virtualized allows it to run up to 30% faster than on a comparable Intel Mac.Now, the Windows that runs on Parallels for M1 is the native Arm version of Windows 10 (albeit an Insider Preview), but it can run 32-bit x86 apps and 64-bit ones are forthcoming. Still, I think it's not unreasonable to assume one is likely to materialize within a few months or within the next year when we see an M1X or M2 refresh.And even though it is Arm-based, if I wanted to run Windows 10 on one of these systems today, I can run a 64-bit system virtualized using software like Parallels for Mac, with little or no performance degradation. Unfortunately, Cupertino does not sell a Silicon-based system with that much memory today. In addition, I could use it to replace my Dell 8900 and my HP Proliant ML10 if I had one with enough memory in it, like 32GB or 64GB. New Office 365 Is Terrible License Windows 10Microsoft isn't the only hyperscale provider with cloud Windows desktops today. But, unfortunately, your average small business is not set up to do this today, and indeed, it is not a viable option for a one-person shop or a consumer who wants a Windows desktop in the cloud.But two years from now, I think that is likely to be a very different story. Currently, Microsoft does this with VMs as provisioned resources on enterprise Azure accounts with the right set of Windows, Office 365, and Client Access License (CAL) entitlements. On the other hand, maybe Windows 11 will run on Mac's built-in hypervisor without the need for 3rd-party solutions like Parallels, and Microsoft resells it on the App Store or by some other mechanism.Or maybe Microsoft decides it isn't in their best interest to let consumers run Windows on Apple Silicon and never makes the ISOs or a binary distribution available - at least, that is what Ed Bott believes.Who needs PCs that get orphaned when you have the cloud?Or, we end up running Windows 11 workloads on Azure, which is already a valid way to run Windows today. But I suspect by the time I need to be able to do this, two or three years from now, it will be not only sorted out from a technical standpoint, but Microsoft and Apple will have figured out how to do this from a licensing standpoint.Who knows? Maybe Parallels becomes a Windows 11 Arm retail distributor in this situation, as they do with the x86 version today. There isn't even a way to license Windows 10 on an Arm-based Mac yet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorScott ArchivesCategories |